Sunday, October 16, 2011

Questioning A Candidate's Religion


Mitt Romney’s Mormon problem is back.  Last weekend, at a conservative value voters summit, pastor Robert Jeffress, a supporter of Rick Perry, called Romney's faith a "cult" and said that evangelical voters should not support the former Massachusetts Governor. 

The media quickly jumped on the story.  Most of the coverage asked whether or not evangelicals would be willing to rally around Romney if he becomes the GOP nominee.  None of the mainstream coverage considered whether or not Jeffress was warranted in calling Mormonism a cult (with the exception of Bill Maher who ridiculed Mormon beliefs and called anyone who subscribed to them “gullible”).  By no means should the media endorse the pastor’s comments.  That is not their place.  They do, however, have a responsibility to ask tough questions.

A candidate’s religious preferences and specific beliefs tend to be off-limits for many journalists.  While it’s true that the Constitution guarantees everyone the right to believe or not believe in whatever they choose, that does not mean that voters don’t have the right to know what their elected officials believe.  The argument that these are personal, private issues is completely ridiculous in politics.  If you believe that there is a supernatural, omnipotent deity who oversees and can intervene in all human actions, or if you subscribe to the idea of a master-plan for humanity or fate, you will undoubtedly make decisions keeping these beliefs in mind.  These opinions are far too powerful and run far too deep to separate from politics or anything else for that matter.

A Pew Research Center poll conducted last year found that 41% of Americans believe that Jesus Christ will return to Earth by the year 2050.  According to Christian dogma, Jesus’s return is to be preceded by a rapture, a great earthquake, famine, and war – basically, the end of the world.  It follows, then, that two-in-five Americans believe that the end of the world, as predicted in the Book of Revelation, will likely occur in the next 39 years.  I have the right to know if the person I’m voting for for president is one of them.

Why is this my business?  It’s my business because anyone who truly believes this stuff is going to govern in a way that is congruent with these beliefs.  How could they not?  Take Medicare and Social Security, for example.  What is the incentive for a politician to ensure the long-term solvency of these programs if it’s all over in 39 years?  What about helping the sick and the poor?  Doesn’t matter.  They just need to hang on a couple more decades and then they will enjoy eternal happiness in the Kingdom of Heaven, provided they are Christians.

The end of the world and the return of Christ may be extreme examples, but they illustrate how easily these beliefs, logical or illogical, can affect the policies of those who hold them.  Consider the following issues: stem cell research, abortion, space exploration, publicly-funded scientific research, and Middle East foreign policy.  Christian religious beliefs can influence all of these issues, and depending on the degree to which an individual considers the Bible (or at least their interpretation of it) to be literal, these beliefs can have very substantial impacts. 

The public has a major interest in knowing a political candidate’s religious beliefs.  Journalists should probe candidates for answers to these important questions.  How are citizens to learn this crucial information before casting their votes if not for the press?  Furthermore, shouldn’t politicians be willing to share these beliefs?  For what would be the motivation to conceal them unless they were embarrassingly illogical or outside of the mainstream? Now, I am not suggesting that the press demand that GOP candidate Jon Huntsman reveal whether or not he wears the Mormon “magic underpants” (yes, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints asks that its members wear sacred “traditional undergarments” at all possible times).  I am simply asking that the press not give candidates a free pass to hold illogical, far-out beliefs that the public might find to be seriously unnerving for the sole reason that they fall under the umbrella of religion. 

(Photo courtesy of mormonendowment.com)



No comments:

Post a Comment